Germany

Deserters of CasablancaFactory at Chorzow (indemnities): Order made on 21 November 1927 (Measure of Interim Protection)Jurisdiction of the Courts of Danzig: Annex 2Killing Three Birds with One Stone (S. Olleson)On the Relationship between Ius in bello and Ius ad bellum (J.A. Pastor-Ridruejo)
Research / Publications
Arguing the LaGrand case (M.F. Tinta)Article 36 of the Vienna Convention: private enforcement in American courts after LaGrand (C. Drinan)Cases concerning legality of use of force: no provisional measures against NATO member states (B. Shifman)Consular assistance: rights, remedies and responsibility (C.J. Tams)Consular rights and the death penalty after LaGrand (J. Fitzpatrick)Contribution of the Yugoslav-Italian agreement to settlement of dispute in the North Sea (B. Sambrailo)Diplomatic protection and the LaGrand Case (Z. Deen-Racsmány)Equity in the North sea continental shelf cases (T. Rothpfeffer)Functioning of the ICJ in the contexts of the fisheries jurisdiction cases (F. Przetacznik)ICJ judgment on duty to inform detained persons of their right to consular assistance (W.J. Aceves)Images and models in the World court: the individual opinions in the North Sea continental shelf cases (J.G. Merrills)LaGrand: a challenge to the U.S. judiciary (J. Quigley)Legality of use of force (Yugoslavia v.United States et al.) (P.H.F. Bekker)Legality of use of force: Provisional Measures (C. Gray)Mare Liberum and Opinio Juris: a Grotian reading of the North Sea Continental Shelf Cases (E. Wilson)Provisional measures by the International Court of Justice - the LaGrand Case (J.A. Frowein)Questions of international judicial jurisdiction in the LaGrand Case (A. Orakhelashvili)Recognizing guarantees and assurances of non-repetition: LaGrand and the law of state responsibility (C.J. Tams)Sedentary fisheries and the North Sea continental shelf cases: a paradox revealed (L.F.E. Goldie)Symposium: reflections on the ICJ's LaGrand decision The articles 1-3 of the Geneva Convention 1958 on the Continental Shelf (North Sea Case) (P. Zografou-Valkanou)The binding nature of provisional measures of the ICJ: the "settlement" of the issue in the LaGrand case (J. Kammerhofer)The case of the delimitation of the North Sea Continental Shelf before the ICJ (U. Engel)The clash between U.S. criminal procedure and the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations (J.L. Weinman)The fisheries jurisdiction case: a critique (R. Khan)The fisheries jurisdiction cases (1973) and the ghost of rebus sic stantibus (S.A. Tiewul)The fisheries jurisdiction cases (R.R. Churchill)The LaGrand case (R. Jennings)The LaGrand case and the individual as a subject of International Law (O. Spiermann)The LaGrand decision (H.S. Schiffman)The lateral boundaries of the continental shelf and the judgement of the ICJ (E. Grisel)The legal status of articles 1-3 to the Continental Shelf Convention according to the North Sea cases (M. Nordquist)The limits of continental shelf jurisdiction: some possible implications of the North sea case judgment (R.Y. Jennings)The North Sea continental shelf boundary settlement (F.M. Auburn)The North Sea continental shelf cases (D.H.N. Johnson)The North Sea Continental Shelf cases (K.N. Guernsey)The North Sea continental shelf cases (L.J. Bouchez)The North Sea continental shelf cases revisited (M.K. Nawaz)The North Sea continental shelf cases: a critique (W. Friedmann)The North Sea continental shelf cases: a postscript (L.F.E. Goldie)The North Sea continental shelf cases: a ray of hope for the International Court (L.F.E. Goldie)The problem of extension of fishery zone in the context of fisheries jurisdiction cases (M. Czapiewska)The right to consular assistance under international law: the LaGrand Case before the ICJ (C. Tams et al.)The unenforceable rights to consular notification and access in the United States (A.N. Bishop)The unreality of international law in the United States and the LaGrand Case (J. Fitzpatrick)Towards the humanization of the Viena Convention of Consular Rights: the LaGrand case before the ICJ (M. Mennecke)World Court Rules Against the United States in LaGrand Case (F.L. Kirgis)
Research/ Court Documents
Certain German interests in Polish Upper Silesia (jurisdiction): Dissenting Opinion by M. Rostworowski 25-8-1925 Certain German interests in Polish Upper Silesia (jurisdiction): Judgment, 25-8-1925Certain German interests in Polish Upper Silesia (jurisdiction): Observations by M. Anzilotti, 25-8-1925Certain German interests in Polish Upper Silesia (merits): Annex 1, 25 May 1926Certain German interests in Polish Upper Silesia (merits): Annex 2, 22-3-1926Certain German interests in Polish Upper Silesia (merits): Annex 3, 25-5-1926Certain German interests in Polish Upper Silesia (merits): Dissenting Opinion by M. Rostworowski, 25-5-1926Certain German interests in Polish Upper Silesia (merits): Judgment, 25-5-1926Certain German interests in Polish Upper Silesia (merits): Observations by M. Finlay, 25-5-1926 Certain Property (Liechtenstein v. Germany): Application, 1-6-2001Certain Property (Liechtenstein v. Germany): Declaration of Judge Fleischhauer, 10-2-2005Certain Property (Liechtenstein v. Germany): Dissenting opinion of Judge Berman, 10-2-2005Certain Property (Liechtenstein v. Germany): Dissenting opinion of Judge Elaraby, 10-2-2005Certain Property (Liechtenstein v. Germany): Dissenting opinion of Judge Kooijmans, 10-2-2005Certain Property (Liechtenstein v. Germany): Dissenting opinion of Judge Owada, 10-2-2005Certain Property (Liechtenstein v. Germany): Judgment, 10-2-2005Certain Property (Liechtenstein v. Germany): Observations of the Principality of Liechtenstein, 15-11-2002Certain Property (Liechtenstein v. Germany): Order of 28-6-2001Certain Property (Liechtenstein v. Germany): Preliminary Objections of Germany, 27-6-2002Certain Property (Liechtenstein v. Germany): Summary of the Judgment, 10-2-2005Certain Property (Liechtenstein v.Germany): Order of 12 July 2002Deserters of Casablanca: AwardDeserters of Casablanca: CompromisFactory at Chorzów (Interpretation): Judgment, 16-12-1927Factory at Chorzów (Interpretation): Opinion by M. Anzilotti, 16-12-1927Factory at Chorzów (jurisdiction): Dissenting opinion by M. Ehrlich, 26-7-1927Factory at Chorzów (jurisdiction): Judgment, 26-7-1927 Factory at Chorzów (merits): Dissenting opinion by M. Ehrlich, 13-9-1928Factory at Chorzów (merits): Judgment of 13 September 1928 (Annex)Factory at Chorzów (merits): Judgment, 13-9-1928 Factory at Chorzów (merits): Observations by M. Nyholm, 13-9-1928Factory at Chorzów (merits): Order made on 13 September 1928Factory at Chorzów: Order made on 25 May 1929 Factory at Chorzów: Order made on 25 May 1929 (Annex) Fisheries Jurisdiction (Germany v. Iceland): Dissenting opinion of Judge Gros, 12-7-1973 (translation)Fisheries Jurisdiction (Germany v. Iceland): Dissenting opinion of Judge Gros, 25-7-1974 (translation)Fisheries Jurisdiction (Germany v. Iceland): Dissenting opinion of Judge Onyeama, 25-7-1974Fisheries Jurisdiction (Germany v. Iceland): Dissenting opinion of Judge Padilla Nervo, 17-8-1972Fisheries Jurisdiction (Germany v. Iceland): Dissenting opinion of Judge Padilla Nervo, 2-2-1973Fisheries Jurisdiction (Germany v. Iceland): Dissenting opinion of Judge Petrén, 12-7-1973 (translation)Fisheries Jurisdiction (Germany v. Iceland): Dissenting opinion of Judge Petrén, 25-7-1974 (translation)Fisheries Jurisdiction (Germany v. Iceland): Dissenting opinion of Judges Bengzon & Jiménez de Aréchaga, 18-8-1972Fisheries Jurisdiction (Germany v. Iceland): Judgment (Jurisdiction), 2-2-1973Fisheries Jurisdiction (Germany v. Iceland): Judgment (Merits), 25-7-1974Fisheries Jurisdiction (Germany v. Iceland): Order of 12 July 1973Fisheries Jurisdiction (Germany v. Iceland): Order of 15 February 1973Fisheries Jurisdiction (Germany v. Iceland): Order of 17 August 1972Fisheries Jurisdiction (Germany v. Iceland): Order of 18 August 1972 Fisheries Jurisdiction (Germany v. Iceland): Separate opinion of Judge de Castro, 25-7-1974 (translation)Fisheries Jurisdiction (Germany v. Iceland): Separate opinion of Judge Sir Gerald Fitzmaurice, 2-2-1973Fisheries Jurisdiction (Germany v. Iceland): Separate opinion of Judge Sir Humphrey Waldock, 25-7-1974Fisheries Jurisdiction (Germany v. Iceland): Separate opinion of Judges Forster et al., 25-7-1974Fisheries Jurisdiction (Germany v. Iceland): Summary of the Judgment (Jurisdiction), 2-2-1973Fisheries Jurisdiction (Germany v. Iceland): Summary of the Judgment (Merits), 25-7-1974Fisheries Jurisdiction (Germany v. Iceland): Summary of the Order of 12 July 1973Fisheries Jurisdiction (Germany v. Iceland): Summary of the Order of 17 August 1972Free City of Danzig and the ILO: Advisory Opinion, 26-8-1930Free City of Danzig and the ILO: Opinion by M. Anzilloty, 26-8-1930Free City of Danzig and the ILO: Opinion by M. Huber, 26-8-1930 German settlers in Poland: Advisory Opinion, 10-9-1923Japanese House Tax: AwardJapanese House Tax: ProtocolJohnson v. Eisentrager: Supreme Court Decision, 5-6-1950Jurisdiction of the Courts of Danzig: Advisory Opinion, 3-3-1928Jurisdiction of the Courts of Danzig: Annex 1Jurisdiction of the Courts of Danzig: Annex 3Jurisdictional Immunities (Germany v. Italy): Application of Germany, 22-12-2008LaGrand (Germany v. United States of America): Application, 2-3-1999LaGrand (Germany v. United States of America): Counter-Memorial of USA, 27-3-2000LaGrand (Germany v. United States of America): Declaration of Judge Oda, 3-3-1999LaGrand (Germany v. United States of America): Declaration of President Guillaume, 27-6-2001LaGrand (Germany v. United States of America): Dissenting opinion of Judge Buergenthal, 27-6-2001LaGrand (Germany v. United States of America): Dissenting opinion of Judge Oda, 27-6-2001LaGrand (Germany v. United States of America): Judgment, 27-6-2001LaGrand (Germany v. United States of America): Memorial of the Federal Republic of Germany, 16-9-1999LaGrand (Germany v. United States of America): Order, 3-3-1999LaGrand (Germany v. United States of America): Order, 5-3-1999LaGrand (Germany v. United States of America): Request, 2-3-1999LaGrand (Germany v. United States of America): Separate opinion of Judge Koroma, 27-6-2001LaGrand (Germany v. United States of America): Separate opinion of Judge Parra-Aranguren, 27-6-2001LaGrand (Germany v. United States of America): Separate opinion of President Schwebel, 3-3-1999LaGrand (Germany v. United States of America): Separate opinion of Vice-President Shi, 27-6-2001LaGrand (Germany v. United States of America): Summary of Order, 3-3-1999 Legality of Use of Force (Serbia-M. v. Germany): Application, 29-4-1999Legality of Use of Force (Serbia-M. v. Germany): Declaration of Judge Koroma, 15-12-2004Legality of Use of Force (Serbia-M. v. Germany): Declaration of Judge Koroma, 2-6-1999Legality of Use of Force (Serbia-M. v. Germany): Declaration of Judge Shi, 2-6-1999Legality of Use of Force (Serbia-M. v. Germany): Declaration of Judge Vereshchetin, 2-6-1999Legality of Use of Force (Serbia-M. v. Germany): Declaration of Judge Weeramantry, 2-6-1999 Legality of Use of Force (Serbia-M. v. Germany): Dissenting opinion of Judge Kreca, 2-6-1999Legality of Use of Force (Serbia-M. v. Germany): Joint declaration, 15-12-2004Legality of Use of Force (Serbia-M. v. Germany): Judgment, 15-12-2004Legality of Use of Force (Serbia-M. v. Germany): Memorial of the FRY, 5-1-2000 Legality of Use of Force (Serbia-M. v. Germany): Order of 2 June 1999Legality of Use of Force (Serbia-M. v. Germany): Order of 20 March 2002Legality of Use of Force (Serbia-M. v. Germany): Order of 21 February 2001Legality of Use of Force (Serbia-M. v. Germany): Order of 30 June 1999Legality of Use of Force (Serbia-M. v. Germany): Order of 8 September 2000Legality of Use of Force (Serbia-M. v. Germany): Preliminary Objections of Germany, 5-7-2000Legality of Use of Force (Serbia-M. v. Germany): Request for provisional measures, 28-4-1999Legality of Use of Force (Serbia-M. v. Germany): Separate opinion of Judge Elaraby, 15-12-2004Legality of Use of Force (Serbia-M. v. Germany): Separate opinion of Judge Higgins, 15-12-2004Legality of Use of Force (Serbia-M. v. Germany): Separate opinion of Judge Kooijmans, 15-12-2004Legality of Use of Force (Serbia-M. v. Germany): Separate opinion of Judge Kreća, 15-12-2004Legality of Use of Force (Serbia-M. v. Germany): Separate opinion of Judge Oda, 2-6-1999Legality of Use of Force (Serbia-M. v. Germany): Separate opinion of Judge Parra-Aranguren, 2-6-1999Legality of Use of Force (Serbia-M. v. Germany): Summary of the Judgment, 15-12-2004Legality of Use of Force (Serbia-M. v. Germany): Written statement of the FRY, 18-12-2002Legality of Use of Force (Serbia-M. v. Italy): Joint declaration, 15-12-2004Nikola Jorgić: Urteil, 26-9-1997Nikola Jorgic: Urteil, 30-4-1999North Sea Continental Shelf (Germany v. The Netherlands): Summary of the Judgment (Merits), 20-2-1969Novislav Djajic: Urteil, 23-5-1997Preferential Treatment: AwardPreferential Treatment: Protocol between Germany and Venezuela, 13-2-1903Preferential Treatment: Protocol between Great Britain and Venezuela, 13-2-1903Preferential Treatment: Protocol between Italy and Venezuela, 13-2-1903Preferential Treatment: Protocol between the USA and Venezuela, 17-2-1903Preferential Treatment: Protocols between Venezuela and Blockading PowersRights of Minorities in Upper Silesia (minority schools): Judgment of 26 April 1928Rights of Minorities in Upper Silesia (minority schools): Judgment of 26 April 1928 (Annex 1)Rights of Minorities in Upper Silesia (minority schools): Judgment of 26 April 1928 (Annex 2)Rights of Minorities in Upper Silesia (minority schools): Opinion by M. Huber, 26-4-1928Rights of Minorities in Upper Silesia (minority schools): Opinion by M. Negulesco, 26-4-1928 Rights of Minorities in Upper Silesia (minority schools): Opinion by M. Nyholm, 26-4-1928Rights of Minorities in Upper Silesia (minority schools): Opinion by M. Schücking, 26-4-1928S.S. Wimbledon: Application, 16-1-1923S.S. Wimbledon: Dissenting Opinion by M. Anzilotti and M. Huber, 28-6-1923 S.S. Wimbledon: Dissenting Opinion by M. Schücking, 28-6-1923 S.S. Wimbledon: Judgment, 28-6-1923 S.S. Wimbledon: Judgment, Question of Intervention by Poland, 29-6-1923Territorial Jurisdiction of the International Commission of the River Oder: Judgment of 10 September 1929 Territorial Jurisdiction of the International Commission of the River Oder: Order made on 15 August 1929 (Evidence)Territorial Jurisdiction of the International Commission of the River Oder: Order made on 15 August 1929 (Submissions) Territorial Jurisdiction of the International Commission of the River Oder: Order made on 20 August 1929
Research/ Transcripts
Certain Property (Liechtenstein v. Germany): Oral pleadings, 14-6-2004Certain Property (Liechtenstein v. Germany): Oral pleadings, 16-6-2004Certain Property (Liechtenstein v. Germany): Oral pleadings, 17-6-2004Certain Property (Liechtenstein v. Germany): Oral pleadings, 18-6-2004LaGrand (Germany v. United States of America): Oral Pleadings, November 2000Legality of Use of Force (Serbia-M. v. Germany): Oral pleadings, 10-5-1999Legality of Use of Force (Serbia-M. v. Germany): Oral pleadings, 10-5-1999 (translation)Legality of Use of Force (Serbia-M. v. Germany): Oral pleadings, 11-5-1999Legality of Use of Force (Serbia-M. v. Germany): Oral pleadings, 11-5-1999 (translation)Legality of Use of Force (Serbia-M. v. Germany): Oral pleadings, 12-5-1999Legality of Use of Force (Serbia-M. v. Germany): Oral pleadings, 12-5-1999Legality of Use of Force (Serbia-M. v. Germany): Oral pleadings, 12-5-1999 (translation)Legality of Use of Force (Serbia-M. v. Germany): Oral pleadings, 12-5-1999 (translation)Legality of Use of Force (Serbia-M. v. Germany): Oral pleadings, 20-4-2004Legality of Use of Force (Serbia-M. v. Germany): Oral pleadings, 20-4-2004 (translation)Legality of Use of Force (Serbia-M. v. Germany): Oral pleadings, 21-4-2004Legality of Use of Force (Serbia-M. v. Germany): Oral pleadings, 21-4-2004 (translation)Legality of Use of Force (Serbia-M. v. Germany): Oral pleadings, 22-4-2004 (translation)Legality of Use of Force (Serbia-M. v. Germany): Oral pleadings, 23-4-2004Legality of Use of Force (Serbia-M. v. Germany): Oral pleadings, 23-4-2004 (translation)